Responsividade do questionário de qualidade de vida CCVUQ-Br em portadores de úlcera venosa crônica
Responsiveness of the CCVUQ-Br quality of life questionnaire in chronic venous ulcer patients
Renata Cardoso Couto; Flávia de Jesus Leal; Guilherme Benjamin Brandão Pitta; Solange Andreoni
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Background: Responsiveness is a measure of an instrument’s ability to reflect in its score the variability that has occurred in a patient’s life as a result of an intervention. The CCVUQ-Br has been validated in Portuguese, but its responsiveness still needs to be tested. When this study has been completed, the CCVUQ-Br will be available for use as an instrument capable of detecting and reflecting in its score the changes that take place in the quality of life of people with venous ulcers. Objectives: To evaluate the responsiveness of the CCVUQ-Br. Methods: A longitudinal intervention study was conducted at public and private centers for patients with venous ulcers. The sample comprised people with chronic venous ulcers due to start treatment and the variables analyzed were CCVUQ-Br score and its domain scores, a pain visual analog scale (pain VAS), and the Global Assessment of Change Scale, in addition to CEAP classification, and size of ulcer. The CCVUQ-Br was administered to 51 people about to start treatment who were recruited at random. The CCVUQ-Br was then re-administered 4 weeks after treatment had started. Results: Mean CCVUQ-Br scores reduced from the first to the second administration. The highest mean score at baseline was for the Emotional Status domain, at 63.45, which dropped to 52.00 after 4 weeks. There were also correlations between changes in CCVUQ-Br scores and pain VAS ratings and CEAP class. With regard to the effect size, total CCVUQ-Br score and ulcer size exhibited high sensitivity, while pain VAS and the majority of the CCVUQ-Br domains had moderate sensitivity. Conclusions: The CCVUQ-Br questionnaire is sensitive in the Brazilian population and exhibited response to change in the sample tested.
Keywords
Referências
1 Santos PND, Marques ACB, Vogt TN, Mantovani MF, Tanhoffer EA, Puchalski L. Tradução para o português e adaptação transcultural do instrumento wound quality of life. REME - Rev Min Enferm. 2017;21(1050):1-8.
2 Rocha EA, Alexandre NMC, Silva JV. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment – Wound Module to Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2016;24(2684):1-8.
3 França LHG, Tavares V. Insuficiência venosa crônica. Uma atualização. J Vasc Bras. 2003;2(4):318-28.
4 Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Costa IKF, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56-66.
5 González-Consuegra RV, Verdú J. Proceso de adaptación al castellano del Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) para medir la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con úlceras venosas. Gerokomos. 2010;21(2):80-7.
6 Couto RC, Leal FJ, Pitta GBB, Bezerra RCB, Segundo WSS, Porto TM. Translation and cultural adaptation of Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire. J Vasc Bras. 2012;11(2):102-7.
7 Araújo, RO. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. 2016;16(1):56-66.
8 Smith JJ, Guest MG, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. Measuring the quality of life in patients with venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(4):642-9.
9 Gonzalez-Consuegra RV, Verdu J. Quality of life in people with venous leg ulcers: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(5):926-44.
10 Wong I, Lee D, Thompson DR. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire. J Clin Nurs. 2005;15(3):356-7.
11 Couto RC, Leal FJ, Pitta GBB. Validação do questionário de qualidade de vida na úlcera venosa crônica em língua portuguesa (Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire – CCVUQ-Br). J Vasc Bras. 2016;15(1):4-10.
12 Costa IKF, Nóbrega WG, Costa IKF, et al. Pessoas com úlceras venosas: estudo do modo psicossocial do modelo adaptativo de Roy. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2011;32(3):561-8.
13 Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(4):349-62.
14 Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459-68.
15 Oliveira AS. Índice de qualidade de vida de Ferrans & Powers – versão feridas: estudo da responsividade [tese]. São Paulo: Escola de Enfermagem; 2012.
16 Ribeiro ML. Validação do questionário de qualidade de vida e avaliação do bem-estar subjetivo de crianças respiradoras orais [tese]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2012.
17 Caraviello EZ, Wasserstein S, Chamilan TR, et al. Avaliação da dor e função de pacientes com lombalgia tratados com um programa de escola de coluna. Acta Fisiatr. 2005;12(1):11-4.
18 Porter JM, Moneta GL, International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(4):635-45.
19 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaun Associates. 1988.
20 Kelley K. Constructing confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: theory, application and implementation. J Stat Softw. 2007;20(8):1-24.
21 Oliveira AS. Índice de qualidade de vida de Ferrans & Powers - versão feridas: estudo da responsividade [tese]. São Paulo: Escola de Enfermagem; 2012.
22 Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T, et al. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):285-95.
23 Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459-68.
24 Marôco J. Análise estatística como PASW Statistics (ex-SPSS). Report number – análise e gestão de informação, Lda. Sintra, Portugal: Pêro Pinheiro; 2010.
25 Ribas SA, Mendes SD, Pires LB, et al. Sensibilidade e especificidade dos instrumentos de avaliação da qualidade de vida na artrite reumatoide. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2016;56(5):406-13.
26 Verissimo TAS. O método nas pesquisas sobre a responsividade de escalas que avaliam doenças neurológicas. Cad Pós-Grad Distúrb Desenvolv. 2016;16(1):17-24.
27 Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, Sloan JÁ, Lenderking WR, Aaronson NK. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4(1):70.
28 Hukuda ME, Veríssimo TAS, Fávero FM, Voos MC, Oliveira ASB, Caromano FA. O método nas pesquisas sobre a responsividade de escalas que avaliam doenças neurológicas. Cadernos de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento. 2016;16(1):17-24.
29 Abreu GCC, Camargo O Jr, Abreu MFM, Aquino JLB. Escleroterapia ecoguiada com espuma para tratamento da insuficiência venosa crônica grave. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44(5):511-20. PMid:29019582.
30 Fernandez ML, Broadbent JA, Shooter GK, Malda J, Upton Z. Development of an enhanced proteomic method to detect prognostic and diagnostic markers of healing in chronic wound fluid. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(2):281-90.
31 Leal J, Mansilha A. Como avaliar o impacto da doença venosa crônica na qualidade de vida. Angiol Cir Vasc. 2010;6(4)
32 Valente SFP. Validação de um questionário de saúde e identificação de fatores de risco de quedas para a população idosa portuguesa [tese]. Lisboa: Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa; 2012.
33 Silva DC, Budó MLD, Schimith MD, Ecco L, Costa IKF, Torres GV. Experiências construídas no processo de viver com a úlcera venosa. Cogitare Enferm. 2015;20(1):13-9.
34 Salome GM, Ferreira LM. Qualidade de vida em pacientes com úlcera venosa em terapia compressiva por bota de Unna. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2012;27(3):466-71.
35 Dias TYAF, Costa IKF, Salvetti MG, Mendes CKTT, Torres GGV. Influences of health care services and clinical characteristics on the quality of life of patients with venous ulcer. Acta Paul Enferm. 2013;26(6):529-34.