Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://www.jvascbras.org/article/doi/10.1590/1677-5449.202300402
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Guideline

Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm

Projeto Diretrizes, Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular: aneurisma da aorta abdominal

Grace Carvajal Mulatti; Edwaldo Edner Joviliano; Adamastor Humberto Pereira; Alexandre Fioranelli; Alexandre Araújo Pereira; André Brito-Queiroz; Arno Von Ristow; Lucas Marcelo Dias Freire; Marcelo Martins da Volta Ferreira; Marco Lourenço; Nelson De Luccia; Pierre Galvagni Silveira; Ricardo de Alvarenga Yoshida; Ronald José Ribeiro Fidelis; Sharbel Mahfuz Boustany; Walter Junior Boim de Araujo; Julio Cesar Peclat de Oliveira

Downloads: 8
Views: 776

Abstract

The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, through the Guidelines Project, presents new Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines, on the subject of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. Its development prioritized descriptive guidelines, using the EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed databases. References include randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated by a pair of coordinators, aided by the RoB 2 Cochrane tool and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale forms. The subjects include juxtarenal aneurysms, infected aneurysms, and new therapeutic techniques, especially endovascular procedures. The current version of the guidelines include important recommendations for the primary topics involving diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients, providing an objective guide for medical practice, based on scientific evidence and widely available throughout Brazil.

Keywords

aortic aneurysm, aorta, aortic disease, endovascular procedures

Resumo

A Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, por meio do projeto Diretrizes, apresenta as novas Diretrizes de Aorta Abdominal, referentes aos cuidados de pacientes com aneurisma de aorta abdominal. Para sua elaboração, foram priorizadas diretrizes descritivas, utilizando as bases EMBASE, LILACS e PubMed. As referências incluem ensaios clínicos randomizados, revisões sistemáticas, metanálises e estudos de coorte. A qualidade das evidências foi examinada por uma dupla de coordenadores, com auxílio da ferramenta RoB 2 da Colaboração Cochrane e dos formulários da Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Aneurismas justarrenais, infectados e novas técnicas terapêuticas, principalmente no âmbito endovascular, estão entre os temas estudados. A versão atual das Diretrizes apresenta importantes recomendações para os principais itens que envolvem o diagnóstico, tratamento e acompanhamento de pacientes com aneurisma de aorta abdominal, oferecendo um guia objetivo para prática médica, construído a partir de evidências científicas e amplamente acessível em todo o território nacional.
 

Palavras-chave

aneurisma da aorta, aorta, doenças da aorta, procedimentos endovasculares

References

1 Nobre MRC, Bernardo WM. Diretrizes AMB/CFM. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2002;48(4):290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302002000400027.

2 Migowski A, Stein AT, Da M, Santos S, Ferreira DM. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de diretrizes clínicas [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303564633

3 Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN, et al. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):539-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.090. PMid:20630687.

4 Santo AH, Puech-Leão P, Krutman M. Trends in abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality in Brazil, 2000-2016: a multiple-cause-of-death study. Clinics. 2021;76:e2388. http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2388. PMid:33503194.

5 von Ristow A, Estensoro AE, Corrêa MP, Presti C. Aneurismas da aorta abdominal: diagnóstico e tratamento. São Paulo: SBACV; 2015.

6 Wanhainen A, Verzini F, van Herzeele I, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. PMid:30528142.

7 Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2-77.e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044. PMid:29268916.

8 Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.

9 Wells G, Shea B, O’Connel D. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quailty of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2009 [cited 2023 Mar 13]. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

10 Tan KHM, Salim S, Machin M, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm clinical practice guidelines: a methodological assessment using the AGREE II instrument. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e056750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056750. PMid:35058266.

11 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. PMid:25173340.

12 Bradbury AW, Davies AH, Dhesi JK, et al. Recommendations on the use of open surgical and endovascular aneurysm repair for the management of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm from the guideline development committee appointed by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(6):877-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.047. PMid:33685761.

13 Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2848-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902. PMid:21478500.

14 Chisci E, Kristmundsson T, de Donato G, et al. The AAA with a challenging neck: outcome of open versus endovascular repair with standard and fenestrated stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(2):137-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/08-2531.1. PMid:19456190.

15 Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, Djavani Gidlund K, Hellberg A, Wanhainen A. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011;124(10):1118-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030379. PMid:21844079.

16 Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, Lees T, Earnshaw JJ. Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme. Br J Surg. 2016;103(9):1125-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10173. PMid:27270466.

17 Grøndal N, Søgaard R, Lindholt JS. Baseline prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and hypertension in men aged 65-74 years from a population screening study (VIVA trial). Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):902-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9825. PMid:25923784.

18 Lee ES, Pickett E, Hedayati N, Dawson DL, Pevec WC. Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) act. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(5):1107-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.008. PMid:19307082.

19 Ulug P, Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg. 2016;103(9):1097-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10225. PMid:27346306.

20 Ullery BW, Hallett RL, Fleischmann D. Epidemiology and contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43(5):1032-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1450-7. PMid:29313113.

21 Sampson UKA, Norman PE, Fowkes FGR, et al. Estimation of global and regional incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. 2014;9(1):159-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2013.12.009. PMid:25432125.

22 Sidloff D, Stather P, Dattani N, et al. Aneurysm global epidemiology study: public health measures can further reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality. Circulation. 2014;129(7):747-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005457. PMid:24249717.

23 Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82. PMid:15757960.

24 Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1531-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4. PMid:12443589.

25 Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown M, et al. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329(7477):1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.55. PMid:15545293.

26 Scott RAP, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 1995;82(8):1066-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820821. PMid:7648155.

27 Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, Scott RAP. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2307.

28 Cosford PA, Leng GC. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD002945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2. PMid:17443519.

29 Lederle FA. The last (randomized) word on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1767-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6663. PMid:27802490.

30 Wanhainen A, Hultgren R, Linné A, et al. Outcome of the Swedish Nationwide Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program. Circulation. 2016;134(16):1141-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022305. PMid:27630132.

31 LeFevre ML. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(4):281-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M14-1204. PMid:24957320.

32 Wanhainen A, Lundkvist J, Bergqvist D, Björck M. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(5):741-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.055. PMid:15886653.

33 Akai A, Watanabe Y, Hoshina K, et al. Family history of aortic aneurysm is an independent risk factor for more rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):287-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.007. PMid:25175636.

34 Verloes A, Sakalihasan N, Koulischer L, Limet R. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: familial and genetic aspects in three hundred thirteen pedigrees. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(4):646-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70196-6. PMid:7707569.

35 Ravn H, Wanhainen A, Björck M. Risk of new aneurysms after surgery for popliteal artery aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2008;95(5):571-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6074. PMid:18306151.

36 Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. JAMA. 2013;309(8):806-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.950. PMid:23443444.

37 Hamel C, Ghannad M, McInnes MDF, et al. Potential benefits and harms of offering ultrasound surveillance to men aged 65 years and older with a subaneurysmal (2.5-2.9 cm) infrarenal aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(4):1298-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.074. PMid:29477237.

38 Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al. Management of Abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(Suppl 1):S1-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011. PMid:21215940.

39 Stather PW, Sidloff DA, Dattani N, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of biomarkers for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2014;101(11):1358-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9593. PMid:25131707.

40 Krumholz HM, Keenan PS, Brush JE Jr, et al. Standards for measures used for public reporting of efficiency in health care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(18):1518-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.004. PMid:19017522.

41 Makrygiannis G, Labalue P, Erpicum M, et al. Extending abdominal aortic aneurysm detection to older age groups: preliminary results from the Liège Screening Programme. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;36:55-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.034. PMid:27364735.

42 Krohn CD, Kullmann G, Kvernebo K, Rosén L, Kroese A. Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Surg. 1992;158(10):527-30. PMid:1360823.

43 Chun KC, Schmidt AS, Bains S, et al. Surveillance outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysms identified from a large screening program. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(1):55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.059. PMid:26474507.

44 Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322(22):2211-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18928. PMid:31821437.

45 Thijssen CGE, Bons LR, Gökalp AL, et al. Exercise and sports participation in patients with thoracic aortic disease: a review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019;17(4):251-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2019.1585807. PMid:30887852.

46 Hornsby WE, Norton EL, Fink S, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing following open repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020;40(2):108-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000446. PMid:31478921.

47 Chaddha A, Eagle KA, Braverman AC, et al. Exercise and physical activity for the post-aortic dissection patient: the clinician’s Conundrum. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38(11):647-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22481. PMid:26769698.

48 Wahlgren CM, Larsson E, Magnusson PKE, Hultgren R, Swedenborg J. Genetic and environmental contributions to abdominal aortic aneurysm development in a twin population. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(1):3-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.036. PMid:19939604.

49 Shalhub S, Wallace S, Okunbor O, Newhall K. Genetic aortic disease epidemiology, management principles, and disparities in care. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021;34(1):79-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.012. PMid:33757640.

50 Larsson E, Granath F, Swedenborg J, Hultgren R. A population-based case-control study of the familial risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):47-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.012. PMid:19028058.

51 Ogata T, MacKean GL, Cole CW, et al. The lifetime prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms among siblings of aneurysm patients is eightfold higher than among siblings of spouses: An analysis of 187 aneurysm families in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(5):891-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.08.002. PMid:16275443.

52 Jones GT, Hill BG, Curtis N, et al. Comparison of three targeted approaches to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on cardiovascular risk. Br J Surg. 2016;103(9):1139-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10224. PMid:27426269.

53 Sakalihasan N, Defraigne JO, Kerstenne MA, et al. Family members of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms are at increased risk for aneurysms: analysis of 618 probands and their families from the Liège AAA family study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(4):787-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.11.005. PMid:24365082.

54 van de Luijtgaarden KM, Bastos Gonçalves F, Hoeks SE, et al. Familial abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with more complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(2):275-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.029. PMid:24139982.

55 Gomez D, Swiatlowska P, Owens GK. Epigenetic control of smooth muscle cell identity and lineage memory. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(12):2508-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305044. PMid:26449751.

56 Hof FNG, Ruigrok YM, Lee CH. Shared genetic risk factors of intracranial, abdominal, and thoracic aneurysms. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(3):e004150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.004150. PMid:29420217.

57 Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, et al. The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm. Nat Genet. 2008;40(2):217-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.72. PMid:18176561.

58 Weintraub NL. Understanding abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1114-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr0905244. PMid:19741234.

59 Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Henke PK, Rectenwald J, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 1993 to 2003. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1085(1):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1383.030.

60 Wanhainen A, Mani K, Golledge J. Surrogate markers of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(2):236-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306538. PMid:26715680.

61 Albornoz G, Coady MA, Roberts M, et al. Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections: incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(4):1400-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.098. PMid:16996941.

62 Dietz HC, Cutting CR, Pyeritz RE, et al. Marfan syndrome caused by a recurrent de novo missense mutation in the fibrillin gene. Nature. 1991;352(6333):337-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/352337a0. PMid:1852208.

63 Faivre L, Masurel-Paulet A, Collod-Béroud G, et al. Clinical and molecular study of 320 children with Marfan syndrome and related type I fibrillinopathies in a series of 1009 Probands with pathogenic FBN1 mutations. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):391-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0703. PMid:19117906.

64 LeMaire SA, McDonald MLN, Guo DC, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections spanning FBN1 at 15q21.1. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):996-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.934. PMid:21909107.

65 Collod-Béroud G, le Bourdelles S, Ades L, et al. Update of the UMD- FBN1 mutation database and creation of an FBN1 polymorphism database. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(3):199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.10249. PMid:12938084.

66 Loeys BL, Chen J, Neptune ER, et al. A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat Genet. 2005;37(3):275-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1511. PMid:15731757.

67 Baas AF, Medic J, van ’t Slot R, et al. Association of the TGF-β receptor genes with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(2):240-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.141. PMid:19672284.

68 Kim HW, Stansfield BK. Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Aortic Aneurysms. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:7268521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7268521. PMid:28116311.

69 Gurung R, Choong AM, Woo CC, Foo R, Sorokin V. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6334. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176334. PMid:32878347.

70 Altobelli E, Rapacchietta L, Profeta V, Fagnano R. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2805. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122805. PMid:30544688.

71 Karkos C, Mukhopadhyay U, Papakostas I, Ghosh J, Thomson G, Hughes R. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the role of clinical examination and opportunistic detection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(3):299-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.1002. PMid:10753695.

72 Beede SD, Ballard DJ, James EM, Ilstrup DM, Hallet JW Jr. Positive predictive value of clinical suspicion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Implications for efficient use of abdominal ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(3):549-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1990.00390150053010. PMid:2106847.

73 Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, Bowles CA, Nelson DB, Haas MA. The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):833-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.6.833. PMid:10737283.

74 Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA. 1999;281(1):77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.1.77. PMid:9892455.

75 Long A, Rouet L, Lindholt JS, Allaire E. Measuring the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and critical analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(5):515-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.01.018. PMid:22336051.

76 Rubano E, Mehta N, Caputo W, Paladino L, Sinert R. Systematic review: emergency department bedside ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(2):128-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12080. PMid:23406071.

77 Mora C, Marcus C, Barbe C, Ecarnot F, Long A. Measurement of maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm by angio-CT: reproducibility is better with the semi-automated method. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(2):139-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.013. PMid:24268793.

78 Engellau L, Albrechtsson U, Dahlström N, Norgren L, Persson A, Larsson EM. Measurements before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MR imaging with MRA vs. angiography and CT. Acta Radiol. 2003;44(2):177-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0455.2003.00029.x. PMid:12694105.

79 Murakami M, Morikage N, Samura M, Yamashita O, Suehiro K, Hamano K. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for diagnosis of infected aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(3):575-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.013. PMid:24200128.

80 Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Black JH, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;146(24):e334-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. PMid:36322642.

81 Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8. PMid:12493255.

82 Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Whelton PK. Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension. 2000;35(2):539-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.35.2.539. PMid:10679494.

83 Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. PMid:26551272.

84 Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Juraschek SP, Solomon SD. Assessment of long-term benefit of intensive blood pressure control on residual life Span. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(5):576-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6192. PMid:32101262.

85 O’Donnell TFX, Deery SE, Shean KE, et al. Statin therapy is associated with higher long-term but not perioperative survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):392-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.084. PMid:29580855.

86 Salata K, Syed M, Hussain MA, et al. Statins reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, rupture, and perioperative mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(19):e008657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008657. PMid:30371297.

87 Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5. PMid:21067804.

88 Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. PMid:30586774.

89 Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. PMid:29133354.

90 Katz DA, Holman JE, Nugent AS, et al. The Emergency Department Action in Smoking Cessation (EDASC) trial: impact on cessation outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(6):1032-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts219. PMid:23125437.

91 Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update: tobacco use and dependence guideline panel. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

92 Berry KM, Reynolds LM, Collins JM, et al. E-cigarette initiation and associated changes in smoking cessation and reduction: the population assessment of tobacco and health study, 2013-2015. Tob Control. 2019;28(1):42-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054108.

93 Smith SC Jr, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(10):2130-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.026. PMid:16697342.

94 Wemmelund H, Jørgensen TMM, Høgh A, Behr-Rasmussen C, Johnsen SP, Lindholt JS. Low-dose aspirin and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):616-625.e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.061. PMid:27460909.

95 Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al. Yield of repeated screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm after a 4-year interval. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1117-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.8.1117. PMid:10789604.

96 Cao P, Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E. Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR): Results from a Randomised Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.026. PMid:20869890.

97 Powell JT, Brady AR, Brown LC, et al. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1445-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa013527. PMid:12000814.

98 United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998;352(9141):1649-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10137-X. PMid:9853436.

99 Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, Zarins CK. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5):1081-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.113. PMid:20304589.

100 Ulug P, Powell JT, Martinez MAM, Ballard DJ, Filardo G. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD001835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub5. PMid:32609382.

101 Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett JW Jr. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(15):1009-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198910123211504. PMid:2674715.

102 Brown PM, Zelt DT, Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(2):280-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.119. PMid:12563196.

103 Cronenwett JL, Murphy TF, Zelenock GB, et al. Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery. 1985;98(3):472-83. PMid:3898453.

104 Hoffman M, Avellone JC, Plecha FR, et al. Operation for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a community-wide experience. Surgery. 1982;91(5):597-602. PMid:7071748.

105 Shang EK, Nathan DP, Boonn WW, et al. A modern experience with saccular aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(1):84-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.002. PMid:23127980.

106 Karthaus EG, Tong TML, Vahl A, Hamming JF. Saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms: patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes in the Netherland. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):852-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003529. PMid:31498185.

107 De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1881-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0909499. PMid:20484396.

108 Rao R, Lane TRA, Franklin IJ, Davies AH. Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):242-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.068. PMid:25240242.

109 Magliano C, Senna K, Santos M, Tura BR, Santos B, Lassance M. Diretriz brasileira para o tratamento do aneurisma de aorta abdominal. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2017.

110 Sampram ESK, Karafa MT, Mascha EJ, et al. Nature, frequency, and predictors of secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(5):930-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.281. PMid:12756335.

111 Johnston KW. Multicenter prospective study of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Part II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9(3):437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(89)70007-0. PMid:2646460.

112 Mitchell KM, Valentine JR. Inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation does not guarantee colon viability in aortic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(2):151-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01151-6. PMid:11848633.

113 Becquemin JP, Majewski M, Fermani N, et al. Colon ischemia following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(2):258-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.001. PMid:18241745.

114 Senekowitsch C, Assadian A, Assadian O, Hartleb H, Ptakovsky H, Hagmüller GW. Replanting the inferior mesentery artery during infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair: Influence on postoperative colon ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(4):689-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.016. PMid:16616221.

115 Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M, South LM, Andrews SM. Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92(10):1208-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5140. PMid:16175532.

116 Sieunarine K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Goodman MA. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for infrarenal aortic surgery: early and late results. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5(1):71-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(96)00035-X. PMid:9158126.

117 Sicard GA, Reilly JM, Rubin BG, et al. Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(2):174-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70260-1. PMid:7853592.

118 Cambria RP, Brewster DC, Abbott WM, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg. 1990;11(2):314-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(90)90275-F. PMid:2405200.

119 Caradu C, Ammollo RP, Dari L, et al. Management of inflammatory aortic aneurysms: a scoping review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65(4):493-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.003. PMid:36623764.

120 Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):567-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. PMid:28641875.

121 Indrakusuma R, Jalalzadeh H, van der Meij JE, Balm R, Koelemay MJW. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement versus sutured closure to prevent incisional hernias after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair via midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(1):120-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.021. PMid:29685678.

122 Knott AW, Kalra M, Duncan AA, et al. Open repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAA) remains a safe option in the era of fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(4):695-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.007. PMid:18272317.

123 Jongkind V, Yeung KK, Akkersdijk GJM, et al. Juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):760-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.049. PMid:20382492.

124 Chaufour X, Segal J, Soler R, et al. Durability of open repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicentre retrospective study in five French academic centres. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(1):40-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.010. PMid:31530501.

125 Greenberg RK, Haulon S, O’Neill S, Lyden S, Ouriel K. Primary endovascular repair of juxtarenal aneurysms with fenestrated endovascular grafting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(5):484-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.015. PMid:15079770.

126 Ambler G, Boyle JR, Cousins C, et al. Early results of fenestrated endovascular repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom. Circulation. 2012;125(22):2707-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070334. PMid:22665884.

127 Wu H, Zhang L, Li M, Wei S, Zhang C, Bai H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with the p-Branch. Front Surg. 2022;9:879682. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.879682. PMid:35574550.

128 Doonan RJ, Girsowicz E, Dubois L, Gill HL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates lower perioperative mortality compared with open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(6):2054-2064.e3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.464. PMid:31327612.

129 Patel SR, Ormesher DC, Griffin R, Jackson RJ, Lip GYH, Vallabhaneni SR. Comparison of open, standard, and complex endovascular aortic repair treatments for juxtarenal/short neck aneurysms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(5):696-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.042. PMid:35221243.

130 Rosenfeld ES, Macsata RA, Lala S, et al. Open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in the elderly is not associated with increased thirty-day mortality compared with fenestrated endovascular grafting. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(4):1139-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.121. PMid:32919026.

131 Zettervall SL, Schermerhorn ML, Soden PA, et al. The effect of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):626-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.036. PMid:27988158.

132 Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GPS, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1. PMid:15351191.

133 EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2187-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66628-7. PMid:15978926.

134 Prinssen M, Verhoeven ELG, Buth J, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042002. PMid:15483279.

135 Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(5):1167-1173.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.124. PMid:21276681.

136 Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1988-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1207481. PMid:23171095.

137 Lovegrove RE, Javid M, Magee TR, Galland RB. A meta-analysis of 21 178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2008;95(6):677-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6240. PMid:18446774.

138 Sajid MS, Desai M, Haider Z, Baker DM, Hamilton G. Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) has significantly lower perioperative mortality in comparison to open repair: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2008;31(3):119-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(08)60071-8. PMid:18658009.

139 Paravastu SCV, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R, Palfreyman SJ, Michaels JA, Thomas SM. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD004178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004178.pub2. PMid:24453068.

140 Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1181-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.101. PMid:24440678.

141 Vierhout BP, Pol RA, Ott MA, et al. Randomized multicenter trial on percutaneous versus open access in endovascular aneurysm repair (PiERO). J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(5):1429-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.052. PMid:30292613.

142 Kalish J, Eslami M, Gillespie D, et al. Routine use of ultrasound guidance in femoral arterial access for peripheral vascular intervention decreases groin hematoma rates. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(5):1231-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.003. PMid:25595399.

143 Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1863-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0909305. PMid:20382983.

144 Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Barker CF, et al. Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(6):1050-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.120037. PMid:11743559.

145 Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, Kuhan G, Murray D. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):527-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.050. PMid:23265584.

146 Speziale F, Sirignano P, Setacci F, et al. Immediate and two-year outcomes after EVAR in “on-label” and “off-label” neck anatomies using different commercially available devices: analysis of the experience of two Italian vascular centers. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(8):1892-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.057. PMid:25011083.

147 Lindblad B, Bin Jabr A, Holst J, Malina M. Chimney grafts in aortic stent grafting: hazardous or useful technique? Systematic review of current data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(6):722-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.038. PMid:26371416.

148 Lobato AC, Camacho-Lobato L. Endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms using the sandwich technique. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(6):691-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/JEVT-12-4023R.1. PMid:23210864.

149 Schwierz E, Kolvenbach RR, Yoshida R, Yoshida W, Alpaslan A, Karmeli R. Experience with the sandwich technique in endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(6):1562-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.044. PMid:24613690.

150 Donas KP, Lee JT, Lachat M, Torsello G, Veith FJ. Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies: the PERICLES registry. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):546-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001405. PMid:26258324.

151 Li Y, Hu Z, Bai C, et al. Fenestrated and chimney technique for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):20497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20497. PMid:26869488.

152 Mestres G, Yugueros X, Apodaka A, et al. The best in vitro conditions for two and three parallel stenting during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(4):1227-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.046. PMid:28662925.

153 Melas N, Perdikides T, Saratzis A, Saratzis N, Kiskinis D, Deaton DH. Helical EndoStaples enhance endograft fixation in an experimental model using human cadaveric aortas. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(6):1726-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.048. PMid:22322119.

154 Arko FR 3rd, Stanley GA, Pearce BJ, et al. Endosuture aneurysm repair in patients treated with Endurant II/IIs in conjunction with Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants for short-neck abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):732-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.033. PMid:30850297.

155 Jordan WD Jr, de Vries JPPM, Ouriel K, et al. Midterm outcome of endoanchors for the prevention of endoleak and stent-graft migration in patients with challenging proximal aortic neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(2):163-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602815574685. PMid:25809354.

156 Oderich GS, Ribeiro MS, Sandri GA, et al. Evolution from physician-modified to company-manufactured fenestrated-branched endografts to treat pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):31-42.e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.063. PMid:30583902.

157 Chait J, Tenorio ER, Hofer JM, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Five-year outcomes of physician-modified endografts for repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2023;77(2):374-385.e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.019. PMid:36356675.

158 Linsen MAM, Jongkind V, Nio D, Hoksbergen AWJ, Wisselink W. Pararenal aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(1):238-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.092. PMid:22264696.

159 Katsargyris A, Oikonomou K, Klonaris C, Töpel I, Verhoeven ELG. Comparison of Outcomes with open, fenestrated, and chimney graft repair of juxtarenal aneurysms: are we ready for a paradigm shift? J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(2):159-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550-20.2.159. PMid:23581756.

160 Katsargyris A, Yazar O, Oikonomou K, Bekkema F, Tielliu I, Verhoeven ELG. Fenestrated stent-grafts for salvage of prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(1):49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.03.028. PMid:23642523.

161 Tenorio ER, Balachandran PW, Marcondes GB, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and outcomes of intraprocedure adverse events during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(3):783-793.e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.026. PMid:34742884.

162 Oderich GS, Farber MA, Silveira PG, et al. Technical aspects and 30-day outcomes of the prospective early feasibility study of the GORE EXCLUDER Thoracoabdominal Branched Endoprosthesis (TAMBE) to treat pararenal and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(2):358-368.e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.103. PMid:30612825.

163 Eagleton MJ, Follansbee M, Wolski K, Mastracci T, Kuramochi Y. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes for type II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(4):930-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.095. PMid:26792544.

164 Varkevisser RRB, O’Donnell TFX, Swerdlow NJ, et al. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1670-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.192. PMid:30553730.

165 Jones AD, Waduud MA, Walker P, Stocken D, Bailey MA, Scott DJA. Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years. BJS Open. 2019;3(5):572-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50178. PMid:31592091.

166 Oderich GS, Farber MA, Schneider D, et al. Final 5-year results of the United States Zenith Fenestrated prospective multicenter study for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(4):1128-1138.e2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.128. PMid:32891806.

167 Ferreira M, Mannarino M, Cunha R, Ferreira D, Capotorto LF, Oderich GS. Stent Graft Modification to Preserve Intercostal Arteries Using Thoracoabdominal Off-the-Shelf Multibranched (t-Branch) Endograft. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(3):382-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602821996718. PMid:33759610.

168 Kölbel T, Spanos K, Jama K, et al. Early outcomes of the t-Branch off-the-shelf multi-branched stent graft in 542 patients for elective and urgent aortic pathologies: a retrospective observational study. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(6):1817-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.041. PMid:34171424.

169 Biancari F, Ylönen K, Anttila V, et al. Durability of open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 15-year follow-up study. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(1):87-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(02)42909-6. PMid:11802137.

170 Conrad MF, Crawford RS, Pedraza JD, et al. Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(4):669-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.046. PMid:17903647.

171 Mii S, Mori A, Sakata H, Kawazoe N. Para-anastomotic aneurysms: incidence, risk factors, treatment and prognosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;39(3):259-66. PMid:9678544.

172 Garg T, Baker LC, Mell MW. Adherence to postoperative surveillance guidelines after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair among Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):23-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.003. PMid:25088738.

173 Schanzer A, Messina LM, Ghosh K, et al. Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):16-22.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.006. PMid:25441010.

174 Houbballah R, Majewski M, Becquemin JP. Significant sac retraction after endovascular aneurysm repair is a robust indicator of durable treatment success. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4):878-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.069. PMid:20638230.

175 Go MR, Barbato JE, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS. What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients? J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(6):1181-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.056. PMid:18514835.

176 Sternbergh WC 3rd, Greenberg RK, Chuter TAM, Tonnessen BH. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(2):278-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.075. PMid:18572368.

177 Nyheim T, Staxrud LE, Rosen L, Slagsvold CE, Sandbæk G, Jørgensen JJ. Review of postoperative CT and ultrasound for endovascular aneurysm repair using Talent stent graft: Can we simplify the surveillance protocol and reduce the number of CT scans? Acta Radiol. 2013;54(1):54-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.110291. PMid:23377874.

178 Abbas A, Hansrani V, Sedgwick N, Ghosh J, McCollum CN. 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound for detecting endoleak following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(5):487-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.02.002. PMid:24618331.

179 Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):339-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016. PMid:32035742.

180 Argyriou C, Georgiadis GS, Lazarides MK, Georgakarakos E, Antoniou GA. Endograft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(5):688-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602817722018. PMid:28756719.

181 Vogel TR, Symons R, Flum DR. The incidence and factors associated with graft infection after aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(2):264-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.030. PMid:18241747.

182 Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, et al. Prevention of Infective endocarditis: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1736-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.183095. PMid:17446442.

183 Kakkos SK, Bicknell CD, Tsolakis IA, Bergqvist D. Management of secondary aorto-enteric and other abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas: a review and pooled data analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(6):770-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.014. PMid:27838156.

184 Lyons OTA, Baguneid M, Barwick TD, et al. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(6):758-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.007. PMid:27771318.

185 Calligaro KD, Veith FJ, Yuan JG, Gargiulo NJ, Dougherty MJ. Intra-abdominal aortic graft infection: complete or partial graft preservation in patients at very high risk. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1199-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(03)01043-7. PMid:14681612.

186 Berard X, Brizzi V. Current management of aortic endograft infection: prepare your team for this new challenge. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(4):624-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.016. PMid:31350133.

187 Batt M, Feugier P, Camou F, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes after in situ reconstructions for aortic graft infection. Angiology. 2018;69(5):370-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003319717710114. PMid:28578619.

188 Janko MR, Woo K, Hacker RI, et al. In situ bypass and extra-anatomic bypass procedures result in similar survival in patients with secondary aortoenteric fistulas. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1):210-221.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.515. PMid:32445832.

189 O’Connor S, Andrew P, Batt M, Becquemin JP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for aortic graft infection. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.053. PMid:16828424.

190 Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT. Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25(2):255-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70347-1. PMid:9052560.

191 Oderich GS, Bower TC, Hofer J, et al. In situ rifampin-soaked grafts with omental coverage and antibiotic suppression are durable with low reinfection rates in patients with aortic graft enteric erosion or fistula. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):99-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.018. PMid:21184932.

192 Plotkin A, Magee GA, Elsayed RS, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus portends a poor prognosis after endovascular repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):276-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.274. PMid:31843303.

193 Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(15):1435-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. PMid:26373316.

194 Kieffer E, Gomes D, Chiche L, Fléron MH, Koskas F, Bahnini A. Allograft replacement for infrarenal aortic graft infection: early and late results in 179 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(5):1009-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.040. PMid:15111853.

195 Haidar GM, Hicks TD, Strosberg DS, El-Sayed HF, Davies MG. “In situ” endografting in the treatment of arterial and graft infections. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(6):1824-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.134. PMid:28359717.

196 Antonello RM, D’Oria M, Cavallaro M, et al. Management of abdominal aortic prosthetic graft and endograft infections: a multidisciplinary update. J Infect Chemother. 2019;25(9):669-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.013. PMid:31182331.

197 Li B, Khan S, Salata K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):954-969.e30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.076. PMid:31147117.

198 Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100(7):863-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9101. PMid:23475697.

199 Lal BK, Zhou W, Li Z, et al. Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(6):1394-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.003. PMid:26598115.

200 Baderkhan H, Wanhainen A, Haller O, Björck M, Mani K. Detection of late complications after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and implications for follow up based on retrospective assessment of a two centre cohort. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(2):171-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.02.021. PMid:32209282.

201 Patel SR, Allen C, Grima MJ, et al. A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017;51(6):417-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538574417712648. PMid:28656809.

202 White GH, May J, Waugh RC, Chaufour X, Yu W. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5(4):305-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0305:TIATIE>2.0.CO;2. PMid:9867318.

203 Ameli-Renani S, Pavlidis V, Morgan RA. Secondary endoleak management following TEVAR and EVAR. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(12):1839-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02572-9. PMid:32778905.

204 Bobadilla JL, Hoch JR, Leverson GE, Tefera G. The effect of warfarin therapy on endoleak development after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(2):267-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.290. PMid:20591602.

205 Kapetanios D, Kontopodis N, Mavridis D, McWilliams RG, Giannoukas AD, Antoniou GA. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the detection of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(1):280-294.e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.044. PMid:30385149.

206 Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Ulug P, et al. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):166-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10430. PMid:28160528.

207 Spanos K, Rohlffs F, Panuccio G, Eleshra A, Tsilimparis N, Kölbel T. Outcomes of endovascular treatment of endoleak type Ia after EVAR: a systematic review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;60(2):175-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10854-3. PMid:30650961.

208 Qamhawi Z, Barge TF, Makris GC, et al. Systematic review of the use of endoanchors in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(5):748-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.02.008. PMid:32192844.

209 Scali ST, McNally MM, Feezor RJ, et al. Elective endovascular aortic repair conversion for type Ia endoleak is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality compared with primary juxtarenal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):286-294.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.046. PMid:24684769.

210 Ultee KHJ, Büttner S, Huurman R, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of treatment for type ii endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(6):794-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.06.009. PMid:30104089.

211 Sidloff DA, Stather PW, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2013;100(10):1262-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9181. PMid:23939840.

212 Lo RC, Buck DB, Herrmann J, et al. Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(4):895-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.088. PMid:26796291.

213 Couchet G, Pereira B, Carrieres C, et al. Predictive factors for type II endoleaks after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm by conventional endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(8):1673-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.007. PMid:26303269.

214 Piazza M, Frigatti P, Scrivere P, et al. Role of aneurysm sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in the prevention of type II endoleak-related complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(4):934-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.078. PMid:23384494.

215 Samura M, Morikage N, Otsuka R, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair with inferior mesenteric artery embolization for preventing type II endoleak. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):238-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003299. PMid:30946077.

216 Mulay S, Geraedts ACM, Koelemay MJW, et al. Type 2 endoleak with or without intervention and survival after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(5):779-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.017. PMid:33632609.

217 Schlösser FJV, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, et al. Aneurysm Rupture after EVAR: Can the Ultimate Failure be Predicted? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(1):15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.011. PMid:19008129.

218 Guo Q, Zhao J, Ma Y, et al. A meta-analysis of translumbar embolization versus transarterial embolization for type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(3):1029-1034.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.074. PMid:31677943.

219 Yu H, Desai H, Isaacson AJ, Dixon RG, Farber MA, Burke CT. Comparison of type ii endoleak embolizations: embolization of endoleak nidus only versus embolization of endoleak nidus and branch vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(2):176-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.002. PMid:27993503.

220 Maleux G, Poorteman L, Laenen A, et al. Incidence, etiology, and management of type III endoleak after endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(4):1056-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.056. PMid:28434700.

221 Zoethout AC, Ketting S, Zeebregts CJ, et al. An international, multicenter retrospective observational study to assess technical success and clinical outcomes of patients treated with an endovascular aneurysm sealing device for type III endoleak. J Endovasc Ther. 2022;29(1):57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028211031933. PMid:34342235.

222 Bussmann A, Heim F, Delay C, et al. Textile aging characterization on new generations of explanted commercial endoprostheses: a preliminary study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(3):378-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.004. PMid:28716448.

223 Turney EJ, Steenberge SP, Lyden SP, et al. Late graft explants in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(4):886-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.079. PMid:24377945.

224 Cao P, Verzini F, Zannetti S, et al. Device migration after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Analysis of 113 cases with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(2):229-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.120045. PMid:11854719.

225 Bastos Goncalves F, Hoeks SE, Teijink JA, et al. Risk factors for proximal neck complications after endovascular aneurysm repair using the endurant stentgraft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(2):156-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.003. PMid:25458435.

226 van Marrewijk CJ, Leurs LJ, Vallabhaneni SR, Harris PL, Buth J, Laheij RJF. Risk-adjusted outcome analysis of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large population: how do stent-grafts compare? J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(4):417-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/05-1530R.1. PMid:16048373.

227 Albertini JN, Kalliafas S, Travis S, et al. Anatomical risk factors for proximal perigraft endoleak and graft migration following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(3):308-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.1045. PMid:10753697.

228 Pintoux D, Chaillou P, Azema L, et al. Long-term influence of suprarenal or infrarenal fixation on proximal neck dilatation and stentgraft migration after EVAR. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25(8):1012-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.08.013. PMid:22023937.

229 Sternbergh WC 3rd, Money SR, Greenberg RK, Chuter TAM. Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(1):20-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.022. PMid:14718806.

230 van Prehn J, Schlösser FJV, Muhs BE, Verhagen HJM, Moll FL, van Herwaarden JA. Oversizing of aortic stent grafts for abdominal aneurysm repair: a systematic review of the benefits and risks. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(1):42-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.025. PMid:19428273.

231 Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G, et al. Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(6):1200-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(02)75340-8. PMid:12764265.

232 Bastos Gonçalves F, Oliveira NF, Josee van Rijn M, et al. Iliac seal zone dynamics and clinical consequences after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(2):185-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.003. PMid:28027890.

233 Waasdorp EJ, de Vries JPPM, Sterkenburg A, et al. The association between iliac fixation and proximal stent-graft migration during EVAR follow-up: mid-term results of 154 talent devices. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(6):681-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.001. PMid:19345632.

234 Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Thompson MM, et al. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2014;348(2):f7661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7661. PMid:24418950.

235 Mastracci TM, Garrido-Olivares L, Cinà CS, Clase CM. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(1):214-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.052. PMid:18178478.

236 Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, et al. Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm confers an early survival benefit over open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(4):1091-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.109. PMid:24075109.

237 Kontopodis N, Galanakis N, Antoniou SA, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes of endovascular and open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):399-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.023. PMid:31932143.

238 Queiroz AB, Schneidwind KP, Mulatti GC, et al. Repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms preferably with bifurcated endografts: a single-center study. Clinics. 2014;69(6):420-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2014(06)09. PMid:24964307.

239 Mehta M. Endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Albany Vascular Group approach. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1706-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.103. PMid:20724101.

240 Kontopodis N, Galanakis N, Akoumianakis E, Ioannou CV, Tsetis D, Antoniou GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of institutional and surgeon procedure volume on outcomes after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62(3):388-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.015. PMid:34384687.

241 Vu KN, Kaitoukov Y, Morin-Roy F, et al. Rupture signs on computed tomography, treatment, and outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(3):281-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0327-3. PMid:24789068.

242 IMPROVE trial investigators. Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2017;359:j4859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4859. PMid:29138135.

243 Roosendaal LC, Kramer GM, Wiersema AM, Wisselink W, Jongkind V. Outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(1):16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.014. PMid:31810836.

244 Faizer R, Weinhandl E, el Hag S, et al. Decreased mortality with local versus general anesthesia in endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):92-101.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.090. PMid:30611580.

245 Karkos CD, Harkin DW, Giannakou A, Gerassimidis TS. Mortality after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):770-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.132. PMid:19687383.

246 Lei J, Pu H, Wu Z, et al. Local versus general anesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(4):679-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30326. PMid:35801490.

247 Hellmann DB, Grand DJ, Freischlag JA. Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. JAMA. 2007;297(4):395-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.395. PMid:17244836.

248 Capoccia L, Riambau V. Endovascular repair versus open repair for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):CD010313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010313.pub2. PMid:25879695.

249 Rasmussen TE, Hallett JW Jr. Inflammatory aortic aneurysms: a clinical review with new perspectives in pathogenesis.. Ann Surg. 1997;225(2):155-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199702000-00003. PMid:9065292.

250 Paravastu SCV, Ghosh J, Murray D, Farquharson FG, Serracino-Inglott F, Walker MG. A systematic review of open versus endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(3):291-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005. PMid:19541509.

251 Joergensen TMM, Christensen K, Lindholt JS, Larsen LA, Green A, Houlind K. High heritability of liability to abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population based twin study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(1):41-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.03.012. PMid:27107486.

252 Sidloff DA, Saratzis A, Sweeting MJ, et al. Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK. Br J Surg. 2017;104(12):1656-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10600. PMid:28745403.

253 Deery SE, Schermerhorn ML. Should abdominal aortic aneurysms in women be repaired at a lower diameter threshold? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018;52(7):543-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538574418773247. PMid:29720046.

254 Erben Y, Bews KA, Hanson KT, et al. Female sex is a marker for higher morbidity and mortality after elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a national surgical quality improvement program analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;69:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.031. PMid:32599114.

255 Tumer NB, Askin G, Akkaya BB, Civelek I, Unal EU, Iscan HZ. Outcomes after EVAR in females are similar to males. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02114-2. PMid:34130661.

256 Corsi T, Ciaramella MA, Palte NK, Carlson JP, Rahimi SA, Beckerman WE. Female sex is associated with reintervention and mortality following elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2022;76(6):1494-1501.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.011. PMid:35705120.

257 Ilyas S, Stone DH, Kang J, et al. Non-guideline-compliant endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women is associated with increased mortality and reintervention compared with men. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(1):118-125.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.109. PMid:34302934.

258 Tedjawirja VN, Alberga AJ, Hof MHP, et al. Mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in women. Br J Surg. 2022;109(4):340-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab465. PMid:35237792.

259 Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):655-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8707. PMid:22389113.

260 Solberg S, Singh K, Wilsgaard T, Jacobsen BK. Increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in women: the Tromsø study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(2):145-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.11.015. PMid:15649720.

261 Li K, Zhang K, Li T, Zhai S. Primary results of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in the at-risk residents in middle China. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0793-5. PMid:29614976.

262 Vavra AK, Kibbe MR. Part One: for the motion. Evidence supports reducing the threshold diameter to 5 cm for elective interventions in women with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(6):611-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.014. PMid:25476927.

263 Norman PE, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the prognosis in women is worse than in men. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2865-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671859. PMid:17548742.

264 Sweet MP, Fillinger MF, Morrison TM, Abel D. The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(4):931-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.054. PMid:21658895.

265 Mazzaccaro D, Malacrida G, Amato B, Alessio Angileri S, Ierardi AM, Nano G. Preliminary experience with the use of ultra-low profile endografts. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23(6):448-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2017.16523. PMid:29097346.

266 Ash J, Chandra V, Rzucidlo E, Vouyouka A, Hunter M. LUCY results show females have equivalent outcomes to males following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair despite more complex aortic morphology. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):566-575.e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.080. PMid:31918999.

267 Torsello G, Pratesi G, van der Meulen S, Ouriel K. Aortoiliac remodeling and 5-year outcome of an ultralow-profile endograft. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1747-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.059. PMid:30591290.
 


Submitted date:
03/13/2023

Accepted date:
06/15/2023

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
653fd329a953954222754703 jvb Articles
Links & Downloads

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections