Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://www.jvascbras.org/article/doi/10.1590/1677-5449.202400651
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Artigo Original

Tradução e validação para o português brasileiro do Post-Catheterization Questionnaire, ou Escala de Cooper, para análise da qualidade de vida após punção arterial em arteriografia diagnóstica dos membros inferiores

Translation and validation into Brazilian Portuguese of the Post-Catheterization Questionnaire, or Cooper Scale, for post-puncture quality of life analysis in diagnostic arteriography of the lower limbs  

Igor Calixto Novais Dias; Marcelo Passos Teivelis; Gabriel Grizzo Cucato; Felipe Nasser; Marcelo Calil Burihan; Henrique Jorge Guedes Neto

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202400651 J Vasc Bras, vol.24, e20240065, 2025
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 4

Resumo

Contexto: A Escala de Cooper é um questionário originalmente desenvolvido em língua inglesa para avaliar a qualidade de vida após punção arterial em procedimentos como arteriografia e angioplastia. A escala analisa, especificamente, a preferência do paciente entre os acessos radial e femoral.

Objetivos: Traduzir e validar a Escala de Cooper para o português brasileiro.

Métodos: O processo de tradução seguiu diretrizes internacionais de validação linguística e foi conduzido com 62 pacientes portadores de doença arterial obstrutiva periférica submetidos à arteriografia diagnóstica em um hospital quaternário de São Paulo. A confiabilidade foi avaliada por meio de testes de reprodutibilidade (teste-reteste com intervalo de 24 horas) e de consistência interna. A validade de construto foi analisada a partir da correlação entre os itens da Escala de Cooper e os do EUROQOL 5D-5L, o qual também foi respondido pelos 62 pacientes.

Resultados: A Escala de Cooper apresentou consistência interna moderada e alta confiabilidade no teste-reteste, com coeficientes de correlação intraclasse variando de 0,563 a 0,834 (p < 0,001). Foram observadas correlações significativas entre os itens da Escala de Cooper e os do EQ-5D-5L.

Conclusões: A Escala de Cooper foi traduzida e validada para o português do Brasil, demonstrando adequação psicométrica e confiabilidade para aplicação em pacientes submetidos à punção arterial.

Palavras-chave

Escala de Cooper; questionários; validação; radial; arteriografia

Abstract

Background: The Cooper Scale is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to analyze quality of life after arterial puncture for procedures such as arteriography and angioplasty. The CS also specifically asks about the patient’s preference for radial or femoral artery access.

Objectives: To translate the Cooper Scale into Brazilian Portuguese and validate it.

Methods: The translation process was conducted in accordance with international linguistic validation guidelines with a sample of 62 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who underwent diagnostic arteriography at a quaternary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Reliability was assessed with tests of reproducibility (test-retest with a 24-hour interval) and internal consistency. Construct validity was analyzed in terms of the correlation between the items on the Cooper Scale and those of the EUROQOL 5D-5L, which was also administered to the 62 patients in the sample.

Results: The translated Cooper Scale had moderate internal consistency and high reliability in the test-retest analysis, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.563 to 0.834 (p < 0.001). Significant correlations were observed between the items on the Cooper Scale and those on the EQ-5D-5L..

Conclusions: The Cooper Scale was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and then validated, demonstrating adequate psychometrics and reliability for administration to patients who have undergone arterial punctures.

Keywords

Cooper Scale; questionnaires; validation; radial; arteriography

Referências

1 Eagleton MJ. Intraprocedural imaging: flat panel detectors, rotational angiography, FluoroCT, IVUS, or still the portable C-arm? J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4, Suppl):50S-9S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.144. PMid:20732783.

2 Schneider PA. Arteriography: guidewire and catheter skills for endovascular surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 18-40.

3 Rao SV, Kaltenbach LA, Weintraub WS, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of same-day discharge after elective percutaneous coronary intervention among older patients. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1461-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1409. PMid:21972308.

4 Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463-654. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174526. PMid:16549646.

5 Cao P, Eckstein HH, De Rango P, et al. Chapter II: diagnostic methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(Suppl. 2):S13-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(11)60010-5. PMid:22172470.

6 Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999;138(3 Pt 1):430-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70143-2. PMid:10467191.

7 Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N. PMid:8263569.

8 Chu R. Effects of teacher’s corrective feedback on accuracy in the oral English of English-majors college students. Theory Pract Lang Stud. 2011;1(5):454-9. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.454-459.

9 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. PMid:11124735.

10 Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(5, Suppl. 1):S80-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17. PMid:28616007.

11 Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paidéia. 2012;22(53):423-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014.

12 Martínez-Hurtado I, Arguisuelas MD, Almela-Notari P, et al. Effects of diaphragmatic myofascial release on gastroesophageal reflux disease: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43799-y. PMid:31086250.

13 Gandek B, Ware JE Jr. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):953-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00086-9. PMid:9817112.

14 Cox T, Blair L, Huntington C, Lincourt A, Sing R, Heniford BT. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing manual compression to vascular closure devices for diagnostic and therapeutic arterial procedures. Surg Technol Int. 2015;27:32-44. PMid:26680377.

15 Schulz-Schüpke S, Helde S, Gewalt S, et al. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(19):1981-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15305. PMid:25399273.

16 Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. PMid:25791214.

17 Carrell TW, Modarai B, Brown JR, Penney GP. Feasibility and limitations of an automated 2D-3D rigid image registration system for complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17(4):527-33. https://doi.org/10.1583/09-2987MR.1. PMid:20681771.

18 Cucato GG, Correia MA, Farah BQ, et al. Validation of a Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH). Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;106(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160004. PMid:26647720.

19 Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(2):166.e7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036. PMid:16443422.
 

Submetido em:
11/09/2024

Aceito em:
14/10/2025

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
69b4628ba953951224250942 jvb Articles
Links & Downloads
1677-7301 (Eletrônico)
J Vasc Bras ©2026 Todos os direitos reservados.

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections